Peer Review Process

• Indus Journal of Computing and Communication employs a double-blind peer review system, ensuring that both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process.
• Each manuscript is evaluated by two experts—one national and one international—who are selected on their subject expertise. The journal maintains and continuously updates a reviewer database to ensure appropriate matches.
• Reviewers critically assess the manuscript’s originality, scholarly rigour, and overall contribution to the field. Based on their evaluation, they may recommend:
  • Acceptance without revisions
  • Minor revisions
  • Major revisions
  • Rejection
• If revisions are requested, authors are expected to address the feedback and resubmit their revised manuscript.
• Revised submissions may be sent back to the original reviewers for reassessment or considered by the editorial team.
• Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could affect their objectivity.
• The peer review process remains strictly confidential.
• The final decision for publication will be after incorporation of suggested modifications by reviewers.